The analog ancestor of the troll: an unrefusable ring, a false persona, a recorded meltdown — and the point where the joke stops being one.

The Prank-Call Tradition

The prank call is the analog ancestor of the internet troll. A stranger seizes a target’s attention through a channel the target cannot refuse, breaks the frame, and — in the classic form — records the reaction for an audience. It is social trolling: it exploits human reflexes, courtesy and credulity and temper, not technical flaws in the telephone network. That last distinction is the whole point, and it separates the prank call cleanly from phreaking, its technical cousin.

Four moves recur across the entire tradition, and tracking them is what makes the form legible as trolling. First, the unrefusable channel — the phone rings and a norm compels an answer, and the prank rides that reflex (Wikipedia). Second, the performance — a persona or a trap does the work, whether the pun-name gag, the character bit, or the surreal non-sequitur (Wikipedia). Third, the artifact — the call is recorded and traded, and the tape, not the call, becomes the cultural object (Wikipedia). Fourth, and this is the moral axis the rest of the tradition turns on, the target’s consent, or lack of it. An absurd bit aimed at a business that shrugs it off is one thing; a call that lands on a private person and does real damage is another; a false emergency report that sends armed police to a home is a third, potentially lethal thing. The tradition runs the length of that line.

Social trolling, not a technical hack

A prank call — also “crank call,” “hoax call,” “goof call” — is a telephone call intended by the caller as a practical joke played on the person who answers. It is a species of nuisance call and can be illegal under certain circumstances (Wikipedia). What defines it is that the payload is a scripted human interaction, not a manipulation of the network. Recorded prank calls “became a staple of the obscure and amusing cassette tapes traded among musicians, sound engineers, and media traders in the United States from the late 1970s” — the recorded-and-traded tape as folk artifact (Wikipedia).

This is worth distinguishing sharply from phreaking, the technical tradition it is forever confused with. Phreaking is “the activity of a culture of people who study, experiment with, or explore telecommunication systems,” classically by exploiting in-band signaling — the 2,600 Hz tone that convinced a telephone switch a call had ended, leaving an open long-distance line. Blue boxes were purpose-built tone generators; practitioners pored over obscure telephone-company technical journals; Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs built and sold blue boxes after the 1971 Esquire article “Secrets of the Little Blue Box” (Wikipedia). The two are orthogonal. A phreak defeats the phone company; a prank caller works the person who picks up (Wikipedia). Everything below is about the latter.

The Tube Bar tapes — the folk artifact

From 1975 until 1977 or 1978, Jim Davidson and John Elmo repeatedly prank-called the Tube Bar in Jersey City, New Jersey, asking the proprietor to summon fictitious patrons with pun and homophone names (Wikipedia). The bar was owned by Louis “Red” Deutsch, a former heavyweight boxer, who usually answered the calls himself. He would bellow the fake names across the room — “Al Coholic,” “Pepe Roni,” “Phil Mypockets” — and, on realizing the prank, respond with shouted threats and profanity (Wikipedia).

The calls were secretly recorded, and by the 1980s dubbed cassettes — the “Red Tapes,” the “Tube Bar Tapes” — circulated widely, reportedly among the staff of major sports teams including the Mets, Dodgers, and Dolphins, before reaching broader audiences (Wikipedia). This is the tape-as-folk-artifact pattern in its purest form. Wikipedia notes the recordings “may have been the inspiration for a long-running gag in The Simpsons” — Bart’s prank calls to Moe’s Tavern — and that the bartender Moe Szyslak is often said to be based on Deutsch. Matt Groening has described himself as a fan of the tapes and characterized the resemblance as “creative synchronicity” rather than direct copying, so the connection is best left where he left it: a likelihood, not a settled fact (Wikipedia).

Deutsch was the unwitting target throughout. The tapes are celebrated for his volcanic reactions, but the humor is entirely at the expense of a private man who never consented — the analog template for the “record the target’s meltdown” troll. The episode The Tube Bar Tapes takes up that story in full.

The Jerky Boys — the form goes mainstream

The Jerky Boys were a comedy act founded in 1989 by the childhood friends Johnny Brennan and Kamal Ahmed of Queens, New York, whose routine consisted of character-driven prank telephone calls and related skits. Brennan and Ahmed performed in exaggerated personas, frequently responding to classified ads (Wikipedia). Their self-titled 1993 debut was certified Platinum by the RIAA, reaching No. 1 on the Billboard Heatseekers chart and No. 75 on the Billboard 200 (Wikipedia).

The 1994 follow-up The Jerky Boys 2 also went Platinum, reached No. 12 on the Billboard 200, and was nominated for a Grammy for Best Comedy Album; The Jerky Boys 3 (1996) reached No. 18 and went Gold (Wikipedia). They headlined a 1995 Touchstone Pictures feature, which was critically panned; Ahmed left the act around 2000, and Brennan carried on as a solo performer (Wikipedia). Their significance is structural: they took the underground tape tradition fully commercial — platinum records, a studio film — and turned recorded prank calls into mass-market comedy (Wikipedia).

Longmont Potion Castle — the avant-garde pole

Longmont Potion Castle, or LPC, is the stage name of an anonymous surrealist prank-call artist active since 1986, based in Denver, Colorado; his real name is kept secret (Wikipedia). He has released more than two dozen albums — Wikipedia catalogs 26 studio records between 1986 and 2026 — of prank calls, sound collages, and thrash-metal interludes, describing the work as “phone work,” absurdist art rather than conventional prank calls (Wikipedia).

His method is technical in performance rather than in the network sense: he modulates and loops his voice with a DigiTech effects unit and stitches the calls into collages set to his own metal compositions. The style is non-confrontational and non-sequitur, closer to the alternative comedian Neil Hamburger than to the Jerky Boys (Wikipedia). The actor Rainn Wilson, a fan, said “there’s a surreal aspect, as if Salvador Dalí were doing prank phone calls” (Wikipedia). The music press treats LPC as a cult “underground prank-call” artist — the form pushed toward fine-art absurdism rather than punchline comedy (Rolling Stone).

The radio era — where the joke got broadcast

In the United States, morning-radio prank calls are governed by 47 CFR § 73.1206: before recording a telephone conversation for broadcast, or airing it live, a licensee must inform any party to the call of the intent to broadcast, subject to narrow “presumed awareness” exceptions. That rule is what turns an aired prank call into a regulatory matter rather than just a joke (Cornell LII). The FCC has enforced it against stations that aired prank calls without notifying the recipient, issuing fines for the practice (Pillsbury).

The 2012 royal-hospital hoax

On December 4, 2012, around 5:30 AM London time, the 2Day FM (Sydney; Southern Cross Austereo) presenters Mel Greig and Mike Christian called King Edward VII’s Hospital in London, impersonating Queen Elizabeth II and the Prince of Wales, to ask after Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, then a patient there (Wikipedia). Nurse Jacintha Saldanha answered, believed the impersonation, and transferred the call to the ward nurse, who disclosed details of the Duchess’s condition on air (Wikipedia).

Saldanha was found dead by suicide on December 7, 2012, in her hospital accommodation, leaving notes, one of which referred to the radio stunt (Wikipedia; CBC). At the 2014 inquest, Coroner Fiona Wilcox ruled the death a suicide and found that the hoax call had been “clearly … pressing on her mind.” No criminal charges were brought; UK prosecutors declined to prosecute, and Australia’s ACMA later found the broadcast breached radio codes of conduct (CBC; Wikipedia).

The record establishes correlation, not legal causation, and it is worth stating plainly: the callers were not charged, and the causal question was never resolved against them. What the case shows is narrower and no less serious — the classic impersonation prank, harmless-seeming and aimed at a famous institution, landed on a private individual and coincided with a death. It is the tradition’s clearest reminder that a “prank call” can carry real, non-consensual human cost with no weapon anywhere in the room (Wikipedia).

The dark mutation — swatting

Swatting is a false report to an emergency service engineered to send an armed police or SWAT response to a target’s location: a fabricated hostage situation, shooting, or bomb threat. The term derives from SWAT — Special Weapons and Tactics; the FBI was using it by 2008, and it entered Oxford Dictionaries Online in 2015 (Wikipedia). It evolved directly out of prank calls to emergency services, with callers using increasingly sophisticated techniques to trigger a heavy response; it “carries a high risk of violence” and has caused deaths. By 2019 the Anti-Defamation League estimated roughly 1,000 swatting incidents a year in the United States, each costing around $10,000 in police resources (Wikipedia).

The 2017 Wichita killing

On December 28, 2017, a swatting call led Wichita, Kansas police to fatally shoot Andrew Finch, 28, an uninvolved man, at his home. The incident arose from an online dispute in Call of Duty: WWII between Casey Viner and Shane Gaskill; Gaskill gave Viner a false address, a home Finch happened to occupy (Wikipedia). Tyler Barriss placed the fraudulent 911 call — falsely claiming he had shot his father and was holding his family at gunpoint — and Finch was shot by responding officer Justin Rapp as he came to the door (Wikipedia).

Barriss pleaded guilty to counts including making a false report resulting in death, cyberstalking, and conspiracy, and was sentenced on March 29, 2019 to 20 years in federal prison; Viner received 15 months and Gaskill 18 (ABC News; Wikipedia). The City of Wichita approved a $5 million settlement over Finch’s death, the city paying $2 million and its insurer $3 million (Wikipedia).

Swatting is the point at which the prank-call lineage detaches from trolling entirely. There is no consent, no in-joke, no audience; the mechanism exists to route lethal state force onto a target. It is assault by proxy (Wikipedia).

What the tradition proves

The prank call is the pre-internet field test of a distinction the glossary draws sharply: trolling — transgression against a frame, aimed at a willing or shrugging target — versus harassment, harm aimed at a specific person who cannot opt out. The whole spectrum lives inside a single phone line.

At the consented, absurd end sit LPC’s phone work, the Jerky Boys’ baited businesses, and the Tube Bar’s comedy-of-rage as heard in hindsight. The target is an institution, a stranger turned good-natured foil, or a bit so surreal that no one is really hurt. This is trolling as folk art: provocation as craft, the tape as the artifact, and it became platinum records and cult albums (Wikipedia).

In the middle sit Red Deutsch and the 2012 royal hoax. The moment a real, non-consenting private person absorbs the cost, the “joke” acquires a victim: Deutsch was mocked without consent, and the 2012 hoax coincided with a death. This is where trolling shades into harassment — the same act, a different target, a different moral weight (Wikipedia).

At the weaponized end is swatting — no consent, no in-joke, a mechanism built to deliver armed force. This is not trolling at all. It is the clearest analog-to-digital proof that the form — an unrefusable call, a false persona, a reaction weaponized — is morally neutral, and that everything depends on the target and the harm (Wikipedia). A healthy culture can metabolize the absurd, consented prank; it has no antibodies for the version aimed at a defenseless private target. Which is why the tradition’s own history ends at a courtroom and a graveside, not a punchline.